FREE BRADLEY MANNING
Fight over truth underway in courtroom
Report on the first week of the trial, protests, solidarity actions, and press coverage.
International week of action. June 1-8. Rally in Sydney, Australia.
|
On the first day of the trial the defense and prosecution faced off with opening statements that both asked “what would you do”
if you were given access to evidence of the true nature of the war,
civilian murders, illegal torture, unnecessary secrecy and thousands of
documents revealing government corruption? What would you do if your
reports to superiors were ignored, and if you learned that the American
people had been lied to?
In his opening arguments defense lawyer David Coombs highlighted
that Bradley Manning is not your typical soldier - rather he is a
conscientious soldier who cared more than most about people, fellow
soldiers and Iraqi civilians alike. Bradley Manning, he explained, is
a "Humanist," who prior to deploying to Iraq had that printed on his
dog tags as his religious preference. For Bradley Manning the horrors of civilian and his fellow soldier’s deaths were troubling and transforming: it inspired him to learn the truth about the war, a war that we now know, thanks in part to Bradley and the whistleblower website WikiLeaks, has been based on lies. Read
Bradley Manning Support Network correspondent Nathan Fuller’s report on
the opening statements from the first day of the hearing.
On the second day, hacker and informant Adrian Lamo who in 2010
reported Bradley to authorities and then published private chat logs via
Wired and the Washington Post, confirmed for the court Bradley’s
conscientious motivations for releasing the information. The remainder
of the second and third days of the hearing focused largely on Bradley’s
training. Witnesses testified that he performed his duties well and he
was praised for being well organized and computer savvy.
Many of the charges against Bradley are specified three different ways.
First that Bradley was not authorized to access the information, at
least in the way he did. Second that he violated regulations in
transferring that information from secure to non-secure computers or
media. Finally, that he gave the information to WikiLeaks. The latter is
the only part Bradley has admitted to. Witnesses agreed that Bradley indeed had authorized access to all of the information,
and that it was normal for additional, unauthorized programs and files,
to be installed on these secure computers. Read the Support Network’s
reports from day 2, and from day 3.
Supporters were blocked from wearing Truth t-shirts in the court room on the first day, but the decision was later overturned.
|
Transcripts of the trial are now available thanks to the Freedom of the Press Foundation who have hired a stenographer.
Throughout three years leading up to this court martial no transcripts
have been issued from the numerous pre-trial hearings. It has been up to
bloggers, journalists, and Bradley’s supporters to take notes by hand
in court. The hiring of a stenographer by the public brings a touch of
transparency back into the court.
Read transcripts from the first week.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario